I appreciate your perspective on this. The screenshot of her original giving credit to Cassie but then removing it, just wow!
I like how you said - she is so close to getting it. I am not so sure, she reveals her own dark side and motives- the need to be superior. Her ‘abc’ method on how to influence (manipulate) others and then take credit for the work they do for changing 🤮!
This part of the book is harmful because it presupposes that whatever you are thinking about others that would cause you so say ‘let them’ is that you are right in your own judgement. She gives a few examples of self inquiry but shallow at best.
She tips her hat to Stoicism, Buddhism and radical acceptance but her own addition of teaching through the lens of superiority is a complete contradiction.
I appreciate your perspective on this. The screenshot of her original giving credit to Cassie but then removing it, just wow!
I like how you said - she is so close to getting it. I am not so sure, she reveals her own dark side and motives- the need to be superior. Her ‘abc’ method on how to influence (manipulate) others and then take credit for the work they do for changing 🤮!
This part of the book is harmful because it presupposes that whatever you are thinking about others that would cause you so say ‘let them’ is that you are right in your own judgement. She gives a few examples of self inquiry but shallow at best.
She tips her hat to Stoicism, Buddhism and radical acceptance but her own addition of teaching through the lens of superiority is a complete contradiction.
Oooo love your last line of this comment. That is so absolutely spot-on.